Peafowl
"Peacock" redirects
here. For other uses, see Peacock (disambiguation).
Peacock
Temporal range: 3–0 Ma
↓
Late Pliocene– Recent
|
|
 |
|
Male Indian Peacock on display: The elongated upper
tail coverts make up the train of the Indian peacock.
|
|
Scientific Classification
|
|
Kingdom:
|
Animalia
|
Phylum:
|
Chordata
|
Class:
|
Aves
|
Order:
|
Gallivormes
|
Family:
|
Phasianidae
|
Subfamily:
|
Phasianidae
|
Species
|
|
Pavo
Cristatus
Pavo
muticus
Afropavo
Congensis
|
|
Peafowl is a species
of birds that include two Asiatic species (the blue or Indian Peafowl
originally of India and Sri Lanka and the greend peafowl of Myanmar, Indochina,
and Java) and one African species (the Congo peafowl native only to the Congo
Basin) of bird in the genera Pavo and Afropavo of the Phasianidae
family, the pheasants and their allies, known for the male's piercing call and,
among the Asiatic species, his extravagant eye-spotted tail convert feathers
which he displays as part of a courshif ritual. The term peacock is
properly reserved for the male; the female is known as a peahen, and the
immature offspring are sometimes called peachicks.
The functions of the elaborate
iridenscene and large "train" of peacocks have been the subject
of extensive scientific debate. Charles Darwin suggested they served to attract
females, and the showy features of the males had evolved by sexual sselection.
More recently, Amots Zahavi proposed in his handicap theory that these features
acted as honest signals of the males' fitness, since less fit males would be
disadvantaged by the difficulty of surviving with such large and conspicuous
structures.
Contents
1.Plumage
o
- 1.1 Iridenscene
- 1.2 Evolution and sexual revolution
- 1.2.1 Female choice
- 1.2.2 Food courstship theory
- 1.2.3 Natural selection
- Plumage colours as attactants
- Redundant signal hypothensis
- Vocalization
- Diet
- Culture Significance
- Gastronomy
- References
- External links
Plumage
Head and neck of Indian peacock (pavo crispapus)
A leucistic Indian peacock
The Indian peacock has iridescent blue and green
plumage. The peacock "tail", known as a "train", consists
not of tail quill feathers, but highly elongated upper tail convert. These
feathers are marked with eyespots, best seen when a peacock fans his tail. Both
sexes of all species have a crest atop the head. The Indian peahen has a
mixture of dull grey, brown, and green in her plumage. The female also displays
her plumage to ward off female competition or signal danger to her young.
The green peafowl differs from the Indian peafowl in that the male has green and gold plumage with black wings with a sheen of blue. Unlike the Indian peafowl, the green peahen is similar to the male, only having shorter upper tail coverts, a more coppery neck, and overall less iridescence.
The Congo peacock male does not display his covert feathers, but uses his actual tail feathers during courtship displays. These feathers are much shorter than those of the Indian and green species, and the ocelli are much less pronounced. Females of the Indian and African species are dull grey and/or brown.
Chicks of both sexes in all the species are cryptically coloured. They vary between yellow and tawny, usually with patches of darker brown or light tan and "dirty white" ivory.
Occasionally, peafowl appear with white plumage. Although albino peafowl do exist, this is quite rare and almost all white peafowl are not, in fact, albinos: they have a genetic mutation called leucisem which causes an overall reduction in pigment which, in peafowl, causes a complete lack of pigment in their plumage, but still leaves them with blue eyes; by contrast, true albino peafowl have a complete lack of melanin and therefore have white plumage, but also an albino's characteristic red or pink eyes. Leucistic peachicks are born yellow and become fully white as they mature.
The green peafowl differs from the Indian peafowl in that the male has green and gold plumage with black wings with a sheen of blue. Unlike the Indian peafowl, the green peahen is similar to the male, only having shorter upper tail coverts, a more coppery neck, and overall less iridescence.
The Congo peacock male does not display his covert feathers, but uses his actual tail feathers during courtship displays. These feathers are much shorter than those of the Indian and green species, and the ocelli are much less pronounced. Females of the Indian and African species are dull grey and/or brown.
Chicks of both sexes in all the species are cryptically coloured. They vary between yellow and tawny, usually with patches of darker brown or light tan and "dirty white" ivory.
Occasionally, peafowl appear with white plumage. Although albino peafowl do exist, this is quite rare and almost all white peafowl are not, in fact, albinos: they have a genetic mutation called leucisem which causes an overall reduction in pigment which, in peafowl, causes a complete lack of pigment in their plumage, but still leaves them with blue eyes; by contrast, true albino peafowl have a complete lack of melanin and therefore have white plumage, but also an albino's characteristic red or pink eyes. Leucistic peachicks are born yellow and become fully white as they mature.
Iridescence
As with many birds, vibrant iridescent plumage colours
are not primarily pigmens, but structural coloration. Optical interperence
bragg replection based on regular, periodic nanostructures of the barbules
(fiber-like components) of the feathers produce the peacock's colours. Slight
changes to the spacing of these barbules result in different colours. Brown
feathers are a mixture of red and blue: one colour is created by the periodic
structure and the other is created by Fabry-Perot interperence peak from reflections
from the outer and inner boundaries. Such structural coloration causes the
iridescence of the peacock's hues interference effects depend on light angle
rather than actual pigments.
Evolution and sexual selection
Charles Darwin first theorized in On the origin of
spesies that the peafowl's plumage had evolved through sexual selection.
This idea was expanded upon in his second book, The descent of man and
selection in relation to sex.
The sexual struggle is of two kinds; in the one it is
between individuals of the same sex, generally the males, in order to drive
away or kill their rivals, the females remaining passive; whilst in the other,
the struggle is likewise between the individuals of the same sex, in order to
excite or charm those of the opposite sex, generally the females, which no
longer remain passive, but select the more agreeable partners.
Sexual selection is the ability of male and female
organisms to exert selective forces on each other with regard to mating
activity.The strongest driver of sexual selection is gamete size. In general,
eggs are bigger than sperm and females produce fewer gametes than males. This
leads to eggs being a bigger investment, and therefore to females being choosy
about the traits that will be passed on to her offspring by males. The peahen's
reproductive success and the likelihood of survival of her chicks is partly
dependent on the genotype of the mate.Females generally have more to lose when
mating with an inferior male due to her gametes being more costly than the
male's.
Female choice
Peacock (seen from behind) displaying to attract
peahen in foreground
Multiple hypotheses attempt to explain the evolution
of female choice. Some of these suggest direct benefits to females, such as
protection, shelter, or nuptial gifts that sway the female's choice of mate.
Another hypothesis is that females choose mates with good genes. Males with
more exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics, such as bigger, brighter
peacock trains, tend to have better genes in the peahen's eyes.These better
genes will directly benefit her offspring, as well as her fitness and
reproductive success. Runaway selection also seeks to clarify the evolution of
the peacock's train. In runaway sexual selection, linked genes in males and
females code for sexually dimorphic traits in males, and preference for those
traits in females.The close spatial association of alleles for loci involved in
the train in males, and for preference for more exuberant trains in females, on
the chromosome (linkage disequilibrium) causes a positive feedback loop that
exaggerates both the male traits and the female preferences. Another hypothesis
is sensory bias, in which females have a preference for a trait in a non-mating
context that becomes transferred to mating. Multiple causality for the
evolution of female choice is also possible.
Work concerning female behavior in many species of animals has sought to confirm Darwin's basic idea of female preference for males with certain characteristics as a major force in the evolution of species.Females have often been shown to distinguish small differences among potential mates, and to prefer mating with individuals bearing the most exaggerated characters.In some cases, those males have been shown to be more healthy and vigorous, suggesting that the ornaments serve as markers indicating the males' abilities to survive and, thus, their genetic qualities.
The peacock's train and iridescent plumage are perhaps the best-known example of traits believed to have arisen through sexual selection, though with some controversy.Male peafowl erect their trains to form a shimmering fan in their display to females. Marion Petrie tested whether or not these displays signalled a male's genetic quality by studying a feral population of peafowl in Whipsnade Wildlife Park in southern England. The number of eyespots in the train predicted a male's mating success. She was able to manipulate this success by cutting the eyespots off some of the males' tails:females lost interest in pruned males and became attracted to untrimmed ones. Males with fewer eyespots, and thus with lower mating success, suffered from greater predation.She allowed females to mate with males with differing numbers of eyespots, and reared the offspring in a communal incubator to control for differences in maternal care. Chicks fathered by more ornamented males weighed more than those fathered by less ornamented males, an attribute generally associated with better survival rate in birds. These chicks were released into the park and recaptured one year later. Those with heavily ornamented feathers were better able to avoid predators and survive in natural conditions.Thus, Petrie's work has shown correlations between tail ornamentation, mating success, and increased survival ability in both the ornamented males and their offspring.
Work concerning female behavior in many species of animals has sought to confirm Darwin's basic idea of female preference for males with certain characteristics as a major force in the evolution of species.Females have often been shown to distinguish small differences among potential mates, and to prefer mating with individuals bearing the most exaggerated characters.In some cases, those males have been shown to be more healthy and vigorous, suggesting that the ornaments serve as markers indicating the males' abilities to survive and, thus, their genetic qualities.
The peacock's train and iridescent plumage are perhaps the best-known example of traits believed to have arisen through sexual selection, though with some controversy.Male peafowl erect their trains to form a shimmering fan in their display to females. Marion Petrie tested whether or not these displays signalled a male's genetic quality by studying a feral population of peafowl in Whipsnade Wildlife Park in southern England. The number of eyespots in the train predicted a male's mating success. She was able to manipulate this success by cutting the eyespots off some of the males' tails:females lost interest in pruned males and became attracted to untrimmed ones. Males with fewer eyespots, and thus with lower mating success, suffered from greater predation.She allowed females to mate with males with differing numbers of eyespots, and reared the offspring in a communal incubator to control for differences in maternal care. Chicks fathered by more ornamented males weighed more than those fathered by less ornamented males, an attribute generally associated with better survival rate in birds. These chicks were released into the park and recaptured one year later. Those with heavily ornamented feathers were better able to avoid predators and survive in natural conditions.Thus, Petrie's work has shown correlations between tail ornamentation, mating success, and increased survival ability in both the ornamented males and their offspring.
A peacock in flight: Zahavi argued that the long train
would be a handicap
Furthermore, peafowl and their sexual characteristics
have been used in the discussion of the causes for sexual traits. Amots Zahavi
used the excessive tail plumes of male peafowls as evidence for his
"Handicap Priciple".Since these trains are likely to be deleterious
to the survival of an individual (as the brilliant plumes are visible to
predator and the longer plumes make escape from danger more difficult), Zahavi
argued that only the fittest males could survive the handicap of a large train.
Thus, a brilliant train serves as an honest indicator for females that these
highly ornamented males are good at surviving for other reasons, and are
therefore preferable mates. This theory may be contrasted with Ronald pisser's
theory (and Darwin's hypothesis) that male sexual traits are the result of initially
arbitrary aesthetic selection by females.
In contrast to Petrie's findings, a seven-year Japanese study of free-ranging peafowl concluded that female peafowl do not select mates solely on the basis of their trains. Mariko Takahashi found no evidence that peahens preferred peacocks with more elaborate trains (such as with more eyespots), a more symmetrical arrangement, or a greater length.Takahashi determined that the peacock's train was not the universal target of female mate choice, showed little variance across male populations, and did not correlate with male physiological condition. Adeline Loyau and her colleagues responded that alternative and possibly central explanations for these results had been overlooked.They concluded that female choice might indeed vary in different ecological conditions.
In contrast to Petrie's findings, a seven-year Japanese study of free-ranging peafowl concluded that female peafowl do not select mates solely on the basis of their trains. Mariko Takahashi found no evidence that peahens preferred peacocks with more elaborate trains (such as with more eyespots), a more symmetrical arrangement, or a greater length.Takahashi determined that the peacock's train was not the universal target of female mate choice, showed little variance across male populations, and did not correlate with male physiological condition. Adeline Loyau and her colleagues responded that alternative and possibly central explanations for these results had been overlooked.They concluded that female choice might indeed vary in different ecological conditions.
Food courtship theory
Merle Jacobs' food-courtship theory states that
peahens are attracted to peacocks for the resemblance of their eye spots to
blue berries.
Natural selection
It has been suggested that a peacock's train, loud
call, and fearless behaviour have been formed by natural selection (not sexual
selection), and served as an aposematic display to intimidate predators and
rivals.
Plumage colours as attractants
Eyespot on a peacock's train feather
A peacock's copulation success rate depends on the
colours of his eyespots (ocelli) and the angle at which they are displayed. A
study by Roslyn Dakin and Robert Montgomerie showed that the angle at which the
ocelli were displayed during courtship was a more important factor in a
peahen's choice of males than train size or number of ocelli.
An experiment by Jessica L. Yorzinski studied the eye movements of peahens while they chose with which mate to copulate. The peahens shifted their gaze from the peacock's display, to their surrounding environment, to different parts of a peacock's train during his display. The lower train is usually evaluated during close-up courtship, while the upper train is more of a long-distance attraction signal. Actions such as train rattling and wing shaking also kept the peahens' attention. This suggests that males have evolved a variety of different display components to increase the chance of winning a female's attention. The peahen's cognitive progress and selective attention thus appear to play an essential role in sexual selection.
An experiment by Jessica L. Yorzinski studied the eye movements of peahens while they chose with which mate to copulate. The peahens shifted their gaze from the peacock's display, to their surrounding environment, to different parts of a peacock's train during his display. The lower train is usually evaluated during close-up courtship, while the upper train is more of a long-distance attraction signal. Actions such as train rattling and wing shaking also kept the peahens' attention. This suggests that males have evolved a variety of different display components to increase the chance of winning a female's attention. The peahen's cognitive progress and selective attention thus appear to play an essential role in sexual selection.
Redundant signal hypothesis
Although an intricate display catches a peahen's
attention, the redundant signal hypothensis also plays a crucial role in
keeping this attention on the peacock's display. The redundant signal
hypothesis explains that whilst each signal that a male projects is about the
same quality, the addition of multiple signals enhances the reliability of that
mate. This idea also suggests that the success of multiple signaling is not
only due to the repetitiveness of the signal, but also of multiple receivers of
the signal. In the peacock species, males congregate a communal display during
breeding season and the peahens observe. Peacocks first defend their territory
through intra-sexual behavior, defending their areas from intruders. They fight
for areas within the congregation to display a strong front for the peahens.
Central positions are usually taken by older, dominant males, which influences
mating success. Certain morphological and behavioral traits come in to play
during inter and intra-sexual selection, which include train length for
territory acquisition and visual and vocal displays involved in mate choice by
peahens.
Pavo Cristatus.
Vocalization
In courtship, vocalization stands to be a primary way
for peacocks to attract peahens. Some studies suggest that the intricacy of the
"song" produced by displaying peacocks proved to be impressive to
peafowl. Singing in peacocks usually occurs just before, just after, or
sometimes during copulation. Alerting other males of mating may reduce
interference or synchronize breeding times.
Peafowl are forest birds that nest on the ground, but
roost in trees. They are terrestrial feeders. All species of peafowl are
believed to be polygamous. In common with other members of the galliformes, the
males possess metatarsal spurs or "thorns" on their legs used during
intracpecipic territorial fights.
Diet
A green peafowl (Pavo muticus)
Peafowl are omnivores and eat most plant parts, flower
petals, seed heads, insects and other arthropods, reptiles, and amphibhian.
Wild peafowl look for their food scratching around in leaf litter either early
in the morning or at dusk. They retreat to the shade and security of the woods
for the hottest portion of the day. These birds are not picky and will eat
almost anything they can fit in their beak and digest. They actively hunt
insects like ants, crickets and termites; millipedes; and other arthropods and
small mammals.
Domesticated peafowl may also eat bread and cracked grain such as oats and corn, cheese, cooked rice and sometimes cat food. It is noticed by keepers that Peafowl love protein rich food including larvae that infest granaries, different kinds of meat, as well as vegetables including dark leafy greens, broccoli, carrots, beans, beets, and peas. They also relish many fruits.
Domesticated peafowl may also eat bread and cracked grain such as oats and corn, cheese, cooked rice and sometimes cat food. It is noticed by keepers that Peafowl love protein rich food including larvae that infest granaries, different kinds of meat, as well as vegetables including dark leafy greens, broccoli, carrots, beans, beets, and peas. They also relish many fruits.
Cultural significance
In the 1486 painting Annunciation with St. Emidius
by Carlo Civelli, a peacock is sitting on the roof above the praying Virgin
Mary.
In Hindu culture, the peacock is the mount of the Lord
Kartikeya, the god of war. A demon king, Surapadman, was split into two by
Karthikeya and the merciful lord converted the two parts as an integral part of
himself, one becoming a peacock (his mount) and another a rooster adorning his
flag. The peacock displays the divine shape of omkara when it spreads its
magnificent plumes into a full-blown circular form.Peacock feathers also adorn
the crest of Lord Krisnha, an avatar of Lord Visnhu, one of the trimurti.
Ancient Greeks believed that the flesh of peafowl did not decay after death, so it became a symbol of immortality. This symbolism was adopted by early Christianity, thus many early Christian paintings and mosaics show the peacock. The peacock is still used in the Easter season, especially in the east. The 'eyes' in the peacock's tail feathers symbolise the all-seeing Christian God and – in some interpretations – the Church. A peacock drinking from a vase is used as a symbol of a Christian believer drinking from the waters of eternal life. The peacock can also symbolise the cosmos if one interprets its tail with its many 'eyes' as the vault of heaven dotted by the sun, moon, and stars. By Christian adoption of old Persian and Babylonian symbolism, in which the peacock was associated with Paradise and the Tree of Life, the bird is again associated with immortality. In Christian iconography, the peacock is often depicted next to the Tree of Life.
Though the peafowl is native to India, in Babylonia and Percia the peacock is seen as a guardian to royalty, and is often seen in engravings upon the thrones of royalty. Nonetheless, using the peacock as the symbol of royalty has an old and distinguished pedigree in India too. The first great dynasty unifying the Indian sub-continent in the 3rd century BCE were known as the "Maurya", lit. "of the peacock", named after the patriarch Chandragupta Maurya. The word "Maurya" is derived from Sanskrit "Mayura" (lit. peacock). The monarchy in Iran is referred to as the Peacock trhone. Melek Tauz (ملك طاووس—Kurdish Tawûsê Melek), the "Peacock Angel", is the Yazidi name for the central figure of their faith. The Yazidi consider Tawûsê Melek an emanation of God and a benevolent angel who has redeemed himself from his fall and has become a demiurge who created the cosmos from the cosmic egg. After he repented, he wept for 7,000 years, his tears filling seven jars, which then quenched the fires of hell. In art and sculpture, Tawûsê Melek is depicted as a peacock. However, peacocks are not native to the lands where Tawûsê Melek is worshipped.
Ancient Greeks believed that the flesh of peafowl did not decay after death, so it became a symbol of immortality. This symbolism was adopted by early Christianity, thus many early Christian paintings and mosaics show the peacock. The peacock is still used in the Easter season, especially in the east. The 'eyes' in the peacock's tail feathers symbolise the all-seeing Christian God and – in some interpretations – the Church. A peacock drinking from a vase is used as a symbol of a Christian believer drinking from the waters of eternal life. The peacock can also symbolise the cosmos if one interprets its tail with its many 'eyes' as the vault of heaven dotted by the sun, moon, and stars. By Christian adoption of old Persian and Babylonian symbolism, in which the peacock was associated with Paradise and the Tree of Life, the bird is again associated with immortality. In Christian iconography, the peacock is often depicted next to the Tree of Life.
Though the peafowl is native to India, in Babylonia and Percia the peacock is seen as a guardian to royalty, and is often seen in engravings upon the thrones of royalty. Nonetheless, using the peacock as the symbol of royalty has an old and distinguished pedigree in India too. The first great dynasty unifying the Indian sub-continent in the 3rd century BCE were known as the "Maurya", lit. "of the peacock", named after the patriarch Chandragupta Maurya. The word "Maurya" is derived from Sanskrit "Mayura" (lit. peacock). The monarchy in Iran is referred to as the Peacock trhone. Melek Tauz (ملك طاووس—Kurdish Tawûsê Melek), the "Peacock Angel", is the Yazidi name for the central figure of their faith. The Yazidi consider Tawûsê Melek an emanation of God and a benevolent angel who has redeemed himself from his fall and has become a demiurge who created the cosmos from the cosmic egg. After he repented, he wept for 7,000 years, his tears filling seven jars, which then quenched the fires of hell. In art and sculpture, Tawûsê Melek is depicted as a peacock. However, peacocks are not native to the lands where Tawûsê Melek is worshipped.
A peacock served in full plumage (detail of the Allegory
of Taste, Hearing and Touch by Jan Ban, 1618)
In Hellenistic imagery, the Greek goddess Hera's
chariot was pulled by peacocks, birds not known to Greeks before the conquests
of Alexander. Alexander's tutor, Aristotle, refers to it as "the Persian
bird". The peacock motif was revived in the Renaissance iconography that
unified Hera and Juno, and on which European painters focused One myth states
that Hera's servant, the hundred-eyed Argus Panoptes, was instructed to guard
the woman-turned-cow, Io. Hera had transformed Io into a cow after learning of
Zeus's interest in her. Zeus had the messenger of the gods, Hermes, kill Argus
through eternal sleep and free Io. According to ovid, to commemorate her
faithful watchman, Hera had the hundred eyes of Argus preserved forever, in the
peacock's tail.
In 1956, John J. Graham created an abstraction of an 11-feathered pecock logo for American broadcaster NBC. This brightly hued peacock was adopted due to the increase in colour programming. NBC's first colour broadcasts showed only a still frame of the colourful peacock. The emblem made its first on-air appearance on 22 May 1956. NBC later adopted the slogan "We're proud as a peacock!" The current version of the logo debuted in 1986 and has six feathers (yellow, orange, red, purple, blue, green). On account of the association between NBC and peacocks, it is sometimes nicknamed the "Peacock Network". A stylized peacock in full display is the logo for the pakintan televition corporation.
In some cultures, the peacock is also a symbol of pride or vanity, due to the way the bird struts and shows off its plumage.
In 1956, John J. Graham created an abstraction of an 11-feathered pecock logo for American broadcaster NBC. This brightly hued peacock was adopted due to the increase in colour programming. NBC's first colour broadcasts showed only a still frame of the colourful peacock. The emblem made its first on-air appearance on 22 May 1956. NBC later adopted the slogan "We're proud as a peacock!" The current version of the logo debuted in 1986 and has six feathers (yellow, orange, red, purple, blue, green). On account of the association between NBC and peacocks, it is sometimes nicknamed the "Peacock Network". A stylized peacock in full display is the logo for the pakintan televition corporation.
In some cultures, the peacock is also a symbol of pride or vanity, due to the way the bird struts and shows off its plumage.
